Author: Dexter Dias
_Dexter Dias_
Reading time: 23 minutes
Synopsis
The Ten Types of Humans (2025) looks closely at the hidden reasons why people act the way they do in very hard situations, like in court or war zones. The book uses ideas from brain science, psychology, and real stories. It shows everything people are able to do when they have to make very difficult choices. This study explains why we act as we do when we are under pressure. It also gives new ideas about our ability to be both very kind and very hurtful.
What’s in it for me? Find out the hidden reasons that affect our most important choices.
Why does someone kill? Why do normal people do very brave things? How does a parent choose which child to save from a burning house? This short summary gives interesting answers to these questions. A human rights lawyer studied human nature for ten years. This summary is based on his work. It finds different ways we act. These are inside us – for example, being angry, being part of a group, or being a hero.
It uses new studies about the mind and sad, true stories. This book will help you see why people can be both very good and very bad at the same time. It also shows how old ways of staying alive still control how we act today. And it will show how you and others might act in very difficult situations.
Blink 1 – The hidden way our minds are built for compassion
Why do some people risk their lives to help strangers? Why do others walk past someone who needs help? The answer might be in how your mind is built, like it has different parts or modules.
Your body grew special organs, like a heart to pump blood or lungs to breathe. In the same way, your brain grew special mental programs. These programs help solve problems that came up often, so we could survive. This idea is called evolutionary modularity. Over millions of years, nature created separate paths (circuits) in our minds. These paths help with specific problems: finding partners, seeing danger, and understanding social groups. If we understand these parts, we can find out the secrets of why we act the way we do in certain situations.
Think about an amazing medical story. It shows a part of our brain that is special for seeing how other people feel. A 52-year-old doctor had two bad strokes. These strokes damaged the part of his brain that helps him see. So, he could not see anything. But when his doctor, Alan Pegna, smiled at him during a check-up, the blind man smiled back. “I’m in total darkness,” he said. “I can’t see you.” But in some way, he saw the smile.
Brain scans showed why. His amygdala – a deep part of the brain – was still sensing human emotions. It did this through an old path in the brain, below the main part. In tests, he could not see shapes or objects. But he could tell the difference between happy and angry faces very well. Nature had made this part of the brain so important for understanding feelings. It worked even when he could not see consciously. It means we truly have a special part in our mind for seeing when others are in pain. Let’s call this part “the Perceiver of Pain”.
But there is a problem. Research by brain scientist Tania Singer shows that when we feel what someone else feels who is in pain, our own brain parts for pain become active. In her studies with couples, women’s brains showed the same activity. This happened whether they got an electric shock or watched their partner get one. Feeling other people’s pain is real in our brains, and it makes us very tired. This is called compassion fatigue: we can only feel so much pain from other people. That’s why sometimes, people protect themselves without thinking about it. They look away from suffering.
But Singer found another amazing thing. She studied a Buddhist monk named Matthieu Richard. She saw that when he worked hard to feel compassion for children who were suffering, he felt warm and wanted to help. Then, different parts of his brain became active. These were the parts of the brain that make us feel good, like when we get something nice. So, maybe calling it “compassion fatigue” is not quite right when people cannot take on others’ pain. This is because real compassion is not just like empathy. It does not just cost us energy – our brains reward us for it.
The Perceiver of Pain helps us understand why caring for others feels both hard and good. It also gives us hope. With practice, we can learn to help others without getting too tired. Now, let’s look at some other important parts of the human mind.
Blink 2 – The Aggressor
After the Battle of Gettysburg, soldiers picked up 28,000 guns from the battlefield. They made a very surprising discovery: 24,000 of the guns were loaded but were never fired. Some had been loaded up to ten times. Thousands of soldiers, even in great danger of dying, could not make themselves shoot their guns.
This story shows another important part of our mind: the Aggressor. We grew the Perceiver of Pain to see others’ suffering. In the same way, we also grew paths in our brain for aggression. This is useful for keeping our families safe or fighting off danger. But this part of the mind does not control most of what we do, which might be different from what you expect. Instead, strong feelings stop us. These feelings make hurting others very upsetting.
Studies show we feel signs of stress in our bodies. For example, our blood vessels get tighter, and our heart beats faster. This happens even when we pretend to be violent with fake weapons and safe targets. We don’t like the act of violence itself, not just what happens after it.
Researchers at Arizona State University made a clever experiment. They used a changed coffee grinder. People thought it would kill small bugs, but the bugs were secretly saved. Before the task, researchers asked people to say how much they felt like small bugs, from one to nine. Half the people did a “practice kill” first. The other half went straight to the main part: kill as many bugs as you want in 20 seconds. The results showed something worrying about how humans think.
Without practice, people who felt more like the bugs killed fewer of them. This was expected. But those who did the practice kill showed the opposite: the more they felt like the bugs, the more they killed. That first wrong act made them feel bad in their mind. Doing more violence helped them feel better. By killing more, they could tell themselves that their first act was okay. This helps explain why fights get worse. Once violence starts, it becomes easier to continue than to face what you have already done.
In very bad situations, especially with children whose brains are still growing, the Aggressor part of the mind can change in a dangerous way. Thomas Elbert, a brain and mind doctor, studied child soldiers in war zones around the world. He found that violence can become something they like and get addicted to. It makes the ‘good feeling’ parts of their brain active, not the ‘bad feeling’ parts. In Matthieu Richard’s brain, compassion made him feel good. In the same way, violence made these traumatized children feel good.
But in most of us, the Aggressor is there but does not control us. Normally, our minds do not want violence. That’s why very harsh and difficult conditions are needed to stop these feelings that stop us from acting. Understanding this fight between different parts of our mind shows why violence does not have to happen. And it shows why growing our kind and caring parts of the mind is more important than ever.
Blink 3 – The Tribalist
In 1937, on the island of Hispaniola, Dominican soldiers held up small branches of parsley to Haitian workers. They demanded that the workers say its Spanish name: perejil. Many Haitian Creoles, whom the Dominican ruler wanted to remove, could not say the “r” sound in the “right” Dominican way. They were killed right there. Between 12,000 and 15,000 people died in this terrible killing. They were killed because of a speech test, even though the two groups looked exactly the same.
This awful example shows another special part of our mind: the Tribalist. The brain paths that form the Tribalist are always looking for group lines. They decide who is part of the group and who is not. This way of thinking probably grew over time because forming groups helped people survive better. Our ancestors who stayed in groups lived longer than those who were alone.
But the Tribalist works in a different way than you might think. For example, studies by Robert Kurzban, a psychologist who studies evolution, showed that ideas about race are not fixed lines that are built into our brains, as we might think.
Kurzban and his team showed university students photos of basketball players. They also heard small parts of an argument between players on the court. After that, the students had to match each saying to the correct player. The researchers watched what mistakes people made. They thought these mistakes would show how the students put the players into groups in their minds.
When players wore no team uniforms, students often confused sayings based on race. They mixed up white players with other white players, and Black players with other Black players. But when the same test included players wearing different colored shirts, mistakes about race went down a lot. Now, students mixed up teammates with each other, no matter their race. The study shows something hopeful: our brain cares more about being on a team than about race.
Simply, the Tribalist uses any signs it can find – race, language, team colors, or in one study, even a coin toss. People quickly prefer their own group, even when groups are made for no special reason. Race is not something we are born with. It is just a recent way from history to find out who is in our group.
We saw this part of the mind work right away after the terrible earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Within two days, new group divisions appeared. For example, armed groups against people who were hurt and helpless. Also, those who had food and water against those who were desperate. But just as quickly, some women made protective groups against them. They used whistles and trained to defend each other when no one else would help.
The Tribalist is a deep part of how we think. But its group lines can change a lot. Knowing about these parts means we are not forced to see the world only through fixed group views. We can actively change the lines we draw between groups.
Blink 4 – The Nurturer
Your house is on fire. You can only save one of your two children. How do you choose? Most of us would say it is impossible. We love our children equally, we think. But studies show a hard truth: when things are very bad, parents make careful choices about which children to save first.
The Nurturer is another special part of our mind. It makes us care for our children. It makes us wake up for crying babies and give up many things for our children. But nature did not make it for a love that never ends. It made it a way to survive and pass on our genes as much as possible.
Studies of mothers with twins born too early showed this clearly. When both babies were very sick, mothers, without thinking, gave more care to the healthier twin. They did not ignore the other twin on purpose. They were putting their limited energy where it had the best chance to succeed. Also, studies show parents feel more sadness for healthy children than for sick ones. They also feel more sadness for teenagers than for babies. This is because these children have a greater chance to have children themselves later.
This way of working can lead to very sad choices. Anna, a seventeen-year-old from Eastern Europe, had a baby after her uncle made her pregnant. She had a very hard choice: keep a baby she was not ready to care for, put him in one of the region’s very bad orphanages, or sell him for adoption. She chose the last option. She got $1,000 from a couple from a Western country. This was through a group that was part of the local “baby trade.”
Was this leaving her child, or protecting him? Anna always felt bad about her choice. But brain research helps us understand it: children who grow up in orphanages have bigger amygdalae in their brains. Their systems for sensing stress get physically changed. This is because different staff members care for them at different times. Being adopted early stops this harm. Anna could not have known about brain science. But something inside her told her that placing her son right away gave him the best chance.
Throughout history, parents have left, sold, or put certain children first when there was not enough of something. The Nurturer does not work based on love that never ends. Instead, it makes very hard decisions in impossible situations. Understanding this part of the mind does not mean we excuse harm. But it does explain why good parents sometimes make choices that seem impossible to imagine.
Blink 5 – The Rescuer
In an important experiment at Kansas University, volunteers watched a woman named Elaine. She answered questions while getting electric shocks. They could have easily left at any time. Instead, more than 80 out of 100 people chose to change places with her and take the shocks themselves.
Brain scans showed something amazing about these choices. It links back to the idea of real compassion instead of just empathy. When we help others, the same parts of our brain become active. These are the parts that make us feel good when we get something pleasant. The Rescuer is another special part of the mind. It helps us not just see pain, but do something about it. This is true even if it costs us something personally.
This goes against a belief that people have held for a long time in psychology and economics. This belief says that humans are basically selfish. They always act only for themselves. Even when people seemed to help others, the idea was that they just did it to feel better themselves. Brain science tells a different story. When we work together with other people, our brains truly reward us for helping.
Vasily’s story shows the Rescuer part of the mind working in the strongest way. Vasily was a drug dealer in Moscow. He drove for Z, who moved young women by pretending to offer them real jobs. But Z was a human trafficker. One woman was Lena. Lena thought she was going to Moscow to work in a hotel.
Vasily heard Z talking about which women to use badly. He understood the job offers were lies. The women were being sold for sex. Vasily had many reasons to say nothing. Z was dangerous. If he warned Lena, he would lose everything. This included Kolya, his dog, whom he loved very much. Yet he told her anyway. They ran away together across the Ural Mountains during a snowstorm. Lena got injuries that killed her during the trip. Vasily just barely lived. Z found him and made him work like a slave for a year as punishment. He never saw his dog again. Years later, Vasily lived with constant pain from what he went through. He said he was not a hero. He was just someone who made a choice that ruined his life to save a stranger.
A researcher named Robert Trivers calls such behavior “reciprocal altruism.” We grew up in groups where helping others, even people we did not know, created ways to support each other. Ants only save their family members. But humans show kindness to more than just family. The Rescuer part of the mind appeared because groups where people helped each other lived better than groups where everyone acted alone.
The Rescuer is not about being a hero. It is a basic part of how our minds are built. It becomes active when we see suffering. It makes us help, sometimes it costs us a great deal personally. It always shows something very important about what it means to be human.
Blink 6 – What the mind with different parts means for human nature
A nurse working in a children’s hospital once explained why her job doesn’t make her too sad or tired: “They’re not my children, are they? I do a 12-hour shift with children in terrible pain. Sometimes I want to cry. Then I go home. The shift is over.” She paused. She looked at a very tired parent beside a hospital bed. “Your shift doesn’t really end, does it?”
That difference shows something basic about how humans think. We are not always kind or always selfish. We are not always logical or illogical. We are made of special parts (modules). Each part becomes active because of certain situations. The same person who risks everything for their child might walk past a stranger who needs help. A boss who gives a lot of money when attractive co-workers are watching might ignore the same requests when alone. These are not opposing things – they are different parts of the mind reacting to different things.
Understanding how our mind is built with these parts changes how we solve social problems that seem very hard to fix. This new understanding gives three key ideas. First, these parts of the mind are helpful tools, not problems. We can learn to grow the parts of our mind that lead to good behavior. We can choose these over the parts that lead to bad behavior, both in ourselves and in other people. Second, these systems can change a lot. Our mental paths can be taught new ways because they are flexible, not set. For example, we can learn to move from just feeling others’ pain to actively showing compassion. This is a skill we can learn. This makes us more likely to help others. It also lets us enjoy helping more.
Third, we are not stuck with our past from evolution. Our group instincts use any signs they can find. So, even old group lines, like the idea of race, can be changed. We can actively change these ideas.
These ideas are important. They help us understand things instead of judging them. When we see that everyone has these different mental programs fighting inside them, we can forgive more. We can forgive others who struggle with different feelings. And we can forgive ourselves when different parts of our mind pull us in different ways.
We are complex living things. Our minds have grown over millions of years to solve problems to help us survive. These parts of the mind do not decide our future. They show us how our minds are built. They show us the hidden programs that we can learn to change. If we understand who we are – what paths work without us knowing it – we can see new ways for who we can become.
Final summary
The main idea from this short summary of The Ten Types of Humans by Dexter Dias is that the human mind has different parts.
Humans grew separate mental paths to solve problems that came up often to help us survive. These include the Perceiver of Pain, which sees others’ suffering. There is also the Aggressor, which is stopped by feelings against violence. The Tribalist forms groups using any signs it can find. The Nurturer makes careful choices to help children survive as much as possible. And the Rescuer makes us help others without expecting anything back.
These parts of the mind can lead to bad behavior in very hard situations. But they can change a lot. By understanding how our mind is built with these parts, we can grow the good possibilities of our mental programs. We are not stuck with our past from evolution. Instead, we can actively change group lines. We can change empathy into compassion. And we can grow our helpful instincts. Seeing the hidden reasons that control how we act helps us to forgive more. It also helps us to choose who we become on purpose.
Okay, that’s it for this Blink. We hope you enjoyed it. If you can, please take the time to leave us a rating – we always appreciate your feedback. See you in the next Blink.
Source: https://www.blinkist.com/https://www.blinkist.com/en/books/the-ten-types-of-human-en